REJOINDER: Kano Security Must Not Be Politicized; A Clarification to Hadiza Nasir Ahmad, Esq

Your recent article raises valid concerns that merit attention. However, it presents a one-sided viewpoint that fails to address the deeper structural and political complexities surrounding security management in Kano State. As citizens, it is essential to examine facts rather than emotions and to identify where the real challenges lie.

1. Security in Nigeria Is Constitutionally Managed by the Federal Government

While you claim that the Kano State Government is “downplaying” insecurity, it’s important to clarify that no governor in Nigeria has control over the military, police, DSS, or Civil Defence Corps. All security agencies operate under directives from Abuja, not from the governor.

This implies:

Even if a governor issues directives, the Commissioner of Police is not required to comply unless approved by the Inspector-General.

Deployment of personnel, special operations, or changes in command structures can be politically influenced at the federal level.

Thus, blaming only the governor for security issues overlooks the constitutional limitations imposed on them.

2. The Ongoing Politicization of Kano’s Security by the Federal Government

In Kano’s case, things are exacerbated as federal interference has reached unprecedented levels.

Evidence of politicization includes:

A Commissioner of Police who openly disregards lawful directives from the Governor as Chief Security Officer of the State.

Federal agencies consistently taking stances aligned with specific political interests rather than prioritizing stability in Kano.

Security deployments being swayed by Abuja actors with political agendas.

You contend that the Governor has “alienated” security agencies. In truth, all documented meetings indicate that the Governor has actively invited and engaged with security heads, but compliance rests solely with federally controlled officers.

3. The Role of Barau Jibrin in Undermining Kano’s Security Architecture

It’s impossible to discuss security challenges honestly without recognizing Senator Barau Jibrin’s influence, as his political interests have impacted the state’s security dynamics.

Consider these examples:

His documented efforts to leverage federal resources in support of specific interests during the Kano Emirate dispute.

Pressure on federally controlled security agencies to act contrary to the state government’s directives, thereby creating a parallel authority.

Attempts to exploit insecurity for political gain, particularly in areas where he has influence.

A security framework that is pulled in different directions cannot operate effectively.

4. Misunderstandings Regarding the Emirate Issue and Its Security Consequences

You suggested that establishing additional emirates under the previous administration enhanced security. However, there is no credible evidence supporting this assertion.

Key points to consider:

The division of the historic Kano Emirate faced widespread condemnation from traditional leaders across the North.

Both the High Court and Appeal Court ruled that the law facilitating the creation of new emirates was fundamentally flawed.

The ongoing crisis you mention did not arise from restoring the ancient emirate but rather from federal interference that compelled security agencies to defy state government directives.

Kano experienced chaos not because of the Governor, but due to federal authorities attempting to impose a parallel reality in opposition to legitimate state actions.

5.Government-Security Relationship: The Narrative Lacks Completeness

You claimed that the governor has failed to create a favourable environment for collaboration with security forces. Here are the facts:

The Governor has consistently convened security meetings, which the Commissioner of Police failed to attend without explanation.

He provided vehicles, logistics, and financial backing for security agencies.

The Governor only raised concerns after facing repeated obstruction by the Commissioner of Police and following public evidence of disobedience accumulating.

A governor cannot effectively cooperate with a security head who ignores lawful instructions and takes direction from political allies.

6. Media Aides Are Not Accountable for Security Outcomes

While you have criticized the governor’s media aides, it’s crucial not to conflate communication issues with security operations. Security is shaped by intelligence, cooperation between agencies, logistics, and community involvement, not by tweets or press releases from government personnel.

7. A Fair Evaluation of the Current Administration

The present government has:

Reconnected with traditional rulers and restored their dignity.

Maintained openness to collaboration with security agencies.

Invested in community-based security initiatives.

Provided logistical support within its constitutional boundaries.

Steered clear of using insecurity for political revenge.

These actions are measurable and responsible, not indicative of a government that “downplays” insecurity.

8. What We Should Avoid as Concerned Citizens

Kano’s intricate security challenges demand careful analysis. Politicizing insecurity only strengthens bandits and disrupts communities.

Constructive criticism is essential. However, it should be balanced with an understanding of:

Constitutional limitations

Federal interference

Political sabotage

The motivations of those who benefit from a destabilized Kano

Conclusion

Your dedication to Kano is admirable. Nevertheless, the notion that insecurity rests solely on the state government’s shoulders is incomplete and misleading.

A truthful assessment must recognize that Kano’s security issues are exacerbated by:

1. A federally controlled police structure that refuses to follow the governor’s directives

2. Political interference from Abuja

3. The Barau factor and the manipulation of traditional institutions

4. A Commissioner of Police who openly defies the state government

Kano requires unity, collaboration, and depoliticized security, not narratives that ignore the true sources of instability.

Idris Salisu Rogo PhD, writes from Bayero University, Kano.